https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.04.010

">

 

I agree with you that the institutional review boards (IRB) play vital roles in protecting human research subjects.  Since its foundation, the board has been involved in nursing engagements that have transformed nursing practice (Barker et al., 2018). The Tuskegee Study, which withheld treatment from black men with syphilis who lived in an impoverished rural region in Alabama, definitively changed the dialogue. The institutional review boards entail healthcare experts and other related professionals who review initial research plans. The board can also advise on the best research plans based on its knowledge and understanding (Peled-Raz et al., 2021). They also conduct continuing review of approved research to ensure that human-subject protections remain in force. Different peer-reviewed publication and academic materials from IRB website has enabled nurses to access factual information at ease. The IRB process is rooted in trust, assuming the best of intentions of investigators and sponsors. Therefore, the board acts as a shrewd watchdog in nursing practice.

References

Barker, R. A., Carpenter, M. K., Forbes, S., Goldman, S. A., Jamieson, C., Murry, C. E., … & Weir, G. (2018). The challenges of first-in-human stem cell clinical trials: what does this mean for ethics and institutional review boards?. Stem Cell Reports10(5), 1429-1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.04.010


Online class and exam help

Struggling with online classes or exams? Get expert help to ace your coursework, assignments, and tests stress-free!